================
@@ -34,6 +34,13 @@ TEST(CPlusPlusLanguage, MethodNameParsing) {
"foo::bar"},
{"int foo::bar::func01(int a, double b)", "int", "foo::bar", "func01",
"(int a, double b)", "", "foo::bar::func01"},
+ {"foo(struct AStruct)", "", "", "foo", "(struct AStruct)", "", "foo"},
----------------
Michael137 wrote:
Are there some negative cases we can test? E.g., `struct` appearing in an
odd/unexpected position.
Also what if we have the identifiers as substrings in the name: `structFoo
class_(enum_arg)`
And maybe something like `struct foo(class a)`. We're in this awkward spot
where we treat C as C++ sometimes, so there's a chance a C program has a type
called `class`, and gets here. Not 100%, but i havent looked at the callsites
of this in a while
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/196525
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
