Nerixyz wrote:

I missed that this was already accepted. If there are no further concerns, I'll 
merge it later.

> Any idea if the MS demangler has an option to drop these? And whether this is 
> something we can/want to do?

Yes, the MS demangler has the option to drop them (`OF_NoTagSpecifier`). 
However, it should be noted that we don't have mangled names for all functions. 
For `static` functions or ones in anonymous namespaces, we don't have symbols. 
There, we only have the demangled name from the compiler which we don't control.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/196525
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to