davide added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D42281#981973, @aprantl wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D42281#981969, @clayborg wrote: > > > Looks like a good start. It might be nice to validate that after "clean" > > that we have no files that are untracked in the test directory? This could > > help us to verify that we don't leave artifacts around. > > > My idea was actually to remove the requirement that Makefiles have to > implement a functional `clean:` rule, since we now can clean by merely wiping > --build-dir. What do you think about that? I think that's a much more robust solution. We had a bunch of issues with `clean` in the past. https://reviews.llvm.org/D42281 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
