On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Greg Clayton <clayb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On Mar 13, 2018, at 10:37 AM, Davide Italiano via lldb-commits >> <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> An alternative proposed by Fred which is an OK middle ground IMHO is >> that of not inserting a decl for the unmangled name, but treat this >> symbol always as-it-is. >> i.e. if we have a symbol _Znwm in some object, we don't insert a decl >> for `operator new(unsigned long)` but for _Znwm itself. >> >> Greg, Jason, would that work for you guys? > > I would be ok with that. >
I'm going to send a review for this soon. Best, -- Davide _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
