labath added a comment. Hmm.. I think I've thought of (or remembered, because I have been thinking about Utility too) a reason why it might be better to keep these in Host. ProcessLaunchInfo cannot be trivially moved to Utility (and indeed, in this patch, you are keeping it in Host), because it contains some references to Host-specific code (PTY stuff). Now, I am not convinced having the PTY class be a member of ProcessLaunchInfo is a good thing, but assuming we don't want to refactor that now, I think it might be better to keep Process(Launch)Info and friends in the same package (i.e., in Host), at least until we have a reason to do otherwise.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58842/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58842 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
