labath added a comment.

Thank you for taking the time to rename this function. I think this has been 
long overdue. However, I believe that the name `AddModule` might cause 
confusion coming from the other direction, as now one may think that it 
unconditionally adds a new module to the target (which also isn't true, as it 
will just reuse the existing one if it's already there). Maybe something like 
`GetOrCreateModule` would be better (and also in line with how llvm names these 
kinds of things)?

As for testing, doesn't this cause a eBroadcastBitModulesLoaded event to be 
sent through some SB API. You could subscribe to that and check that it comes 
only ~once, and contains the right modules. This won't test exactly the thing 
you're interested in, but it might be close enough.


Repository:
  rLLDB LLDB

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D60172/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D60172



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to