mib marked an inline comment as done.
mib added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lldb/source/Target/AbortRecognizer.cpp:81
+    ThreadSP thread_sp, FileSpec module_spec, ConstString function_name) {
+  const uint32_t frames_to_fetch = 10;
+  StackFrameSP prev_frame_sp = nullptr;
----------------
friss wrote:
> mib wrote:
> > JDevlieghere wrote:
> > > Magic value? Why 10?
> > Pretty much. In the beginning I was unwinding the entire stack. But if 
> > there is too much frames (i.e. recursion) this would take too much time. We 
> > agreed with @friss and @jingham to unwind up to 10 frames at most.
> > 
> > Can you think of a better way to do it ?
> I don't think that's exactly what I said. My opinion was that asserts will 
> have a pretty deterministic layout, and that we should know exactly what to 
> unwind to determine whether we have an assert or not.
> 
> In your test, you actually check that the frame with the assert is frame 4. 
> If it is anything other then 4 in any configuration, then the test will fail. 
> You might as well just put 4 in the code here rather than a magical 10.
The number of frames to unwind is different depending on the platform. I chose 
10 to give us some extra margin but I'll change it to 4 or 5,


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D73303/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D73303



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to