mib marked 9 inline comments as done.
mib added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/docs/use/formatting.rst:137
+---------------------------------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
-| ``thread.stop-reason`` | A textual reason each
thread stopped
|
+| ``thread.stop-reason`` | A textual reason why the
thread stopped. If the thread have a recognized frame, this displays its
recognized stop reason. Otherwise, gets the stop info description.
|
++---------------------------------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
> This change seems somewhat orthogonal to this patch. Is the abort recognizer
> the only one where these two will be different? If not I would suggest
> splitting this off into a separate patch.
It wouldn't make sense to split this into different patches since I'm only
changing the current `thread.stop-reason` in this one. And for users who still
want the original behaviour, I added `thread.stop-reason-raw`.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Target/AbortRecognizer.cpp:67
+ StringRef function_name;
+ std::tie(module_spec, function_name) = *assert_location;
+
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
> I like `std::tie` but I wonder if a struct with named fields wouldn't make
> this more readable with less code. Saves you six lines in this function and
> the next one in exchange for a 4-line struct definition. Anyway I'll leave
> this up to you to decide.
>
> ```
> return lldb::RecognizedStackFrameSP(
> new AbortRecognizedStackFrame(thread_sp, assert_location->module_spec,
> assert_location->function_name));
> ```
>
I changed the implementation so I'm only passing 1 parameter (the most relevant
frame) to the constructor.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D73303/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D73303
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
