teemperor added a comment. FWIW, I think the idea was for LLVM to actually move to LLDB's function naming, so our life will soon(TM) be easier when/if that happens.
I also agree that the CapitalizedVariableNames in Clang have some difficulties (especially when they conflict with class names), but if we start this discussion at the dev meeting then I think everyone can say what they think. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D101627/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D101627 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
