labath added a comment.
In D104231#2817068 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104231#2817068>, @teemperor wrote:
> Not sure what else we should do to properly deprecate an API. LLVM's approach
> would be to put `[[deprecated("bla")]]` the C++ APIs (which would mean you
> need a C++14 compiler to use the SB API)
You can always put the attribute inside an `#ifdef c++14`.
Another option is to put something like `#ifdef
LLDB_USE_DEPRECATED_DECLARATIONS` around these functions, forcing to user to
explicitly request their usage.
Neither of these options will help the usages from python, so it's not a fully
general solution, but it sounds like we don't need to worry about that right
now...
> and there is also the `lldb-versioning.h` header (which seems to be reserved
> for actual API breakages).
wow
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104231/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104231
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
