mib marked 2 inline comments as done.
mib added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/scripted/ScriptedThread.cpp:186
+void ScriptedThread::RefreshStateAfterStop() {
+  // TODO: Implement
+  if (m_reg_context_sp)
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
> Still relevant?
Yes. We might need to implement this when introducing execution control to 
Scripted Threads.


================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/scripted/ScriptedThread.cpp:205-206
+        *reg_info, m_scripted_process.GetTarget().GetArchitecture());
+    assert(m_register_info_sp->GetNumRegisters() > 0);
+    assert(m_register_info_sp->GetNumRegisterSets() > 0);
+  }
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
> Does this assertion depend on "user-input"? In other words, can this be 
> triggered by not returning any registers from the interface? 
Yes, the user has to provide some basic register information to be able to 
parse it and use it.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D107585/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D107585

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to