JDevlieghere added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/source/Core/Debugger.cpp:1624 + if (!m_broadcaster.EventTypeHasListeners(Debugger::eBroadcastBitProgress)) { + listener_sp->StartListeningForEvents(&m_broadcaster, ---------------- labath wrote: > labath wrote: > > Why is this conditional on someone else listening for this event? We don't > > e.g. suppress the "Thread #N" blurb if someone is listening for > > eBroadcastBitThreadSelected > (listening for this event **at a specific point in time**) My reasoning was that I didn't want us to handle events if someone else already is. What would be the canonical way to do this? Are you suggestion that we check it in the loop/callback? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D120972/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D120972 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits