aprantl accepted this revision.
aprantl added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

Small nitpicks, otherwise good!



================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Language/CPlusPlus/LibCxxRangesRefView.cpp:41
+private:
+  lldb::ValueObjectSP m_range_sp = nullptr; ///< Pointer to the dereferenced
+                                            ///< __range_ member
----------------
Personally I prefer 
```
///Pointer to the dereferenced __range_ member.
lldb::ValueObjectSP m_range_sp = nullptr;
```
for longer comments.


================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Language/CPlusPlus/LibCxxRangesRefView.cpp:55
+  return 1;
+}
+
----------------
I wonder if it would be more readable to move those one-line function 
definitions into the declaration?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D138558/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D138558

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to