bulbazord added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Target/Memory.cpp:337
std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex> guard(m_mutex);
- if (m_process.IsAlive()) {
+ if (m_process.IsAlive() && !did_exec) {
PermissionsToBlockMap::iterator pos, end = m_memory_map.end();
----------------
jasonmolenda wrote:
> Should we comment that if we've just exec'ed, the inferior is a new process
> and does not have these memory regions allocated.
Yeah, I think that would be helpful.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D140249/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D140249
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
