bulbazord added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/source/Target/Memory.cpp:337 std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex> guard(m_mutex); - if (m_process.IsAlive()) { + if (m_process.IsAlive() && !did_exec) { PermissionsToBlockMap::iterator pos, end = m_memory_map.end(); ---------------- jasonmolenda wrote: > Should we comment that if we've just exec'ed, the inferior is a new process > and does not have these memory regions allocated. Yeah, I think that would be helpful. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D140249/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D140249 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits