Yeah, the help says:
-a <address-expression> ( --address <address-expression> )
Disassemble function containing this address.
so it is doing what is expected. You don't need to specify -c or -e, it will
dump some default number of instructions. Having it do something reasonable
when there is no function containing that address is not totally unreasonable,
except then -a and -s overlap in function, which is a little odd.
Jim
> On Jan 21, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Ed Maste <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 21 January 2015 at 16:57, Zachary Turner <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Is there any way to work around this restriction? It seems like it
>> shouldn't matter what the bounds of the function are, or if there's even a
>> function at this address at all. As long as there's code.
>
> You should be able to use a combination of -s start address / -e end
> address / -c instruction count.
>
> Perhaps we could disassemble a small number of instructions starting
> from the provided address if -a is given an address outside of a
> function.
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
