We should definitely get test coverage in place along with a fix to ensure that we’re not surprised by future regressions.
Kate Stone [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Xcode Runtime Analysis Tools > On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Jason Molenda <[email protected]> wrote: > > This could be r179258 from April 2013 that broke it. > >> On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:04 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Yeah, my guess is the change to make "dis" mean disassemble the current >> function did it, and that was a while ago. Initially, dis didn't mean >> anything except as the repeat command. >> >> Jim >> >>> On Jan 21, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Ed Maste <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 21 January 2015 at 17:35, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> "source list" does the same trick disassemble was SUPPOSED to do. >>>> >>>> But with TOT lldb, something seems to have broken that: >>> >>> It looks like it's been broken for quite some time: We have an LLDB >>> snapshot in the FreeBSD base system, and the version on my desktop is >>> from around r202189. It shows the same behaviour. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
