================ @@ -2008,16 +2008,16 @@ v_add_nc_u64 v[0:1], v[0:1], 0x123456789 // NOSI: :[[@LINE-6]]:1: error: instruction not supported on this GPU (tahiti): v_add_nc_u64 // NOVI: :[[@LINE-7]]:1: error: instruction not supported on this GPU (tonga): v_add_nc_u64 -// FIXME: Literal is truncated but shall be rejected v_add_nc_u64 v[0:1], v[0:1], lit(0x123456789) // GFX1250-ASM: v_add_nc_u64_e64 v[0:1], v[0:1], lit(0x23456789) ; encoding: [0x00,0x00,0x28,0xd5,0x00,0xff,0x01,0x02,0x89,0x67,0x45,0x23] // GFX1250-DIS: v_add_nc_u64_e64 v[0:1], v[0:1], 0x23456789 ; encoding: [0x00,0x00,0x28,0xd5,0x00,0xff,0x01,0x02,0x89,0x67,0x45,0x23] // NOCI: :[[@LINE-3]]:1: error: instruction not supported on this GPU (bonaire): v_add_nc_u64 // NOGFX11: :[[@LINE-4]]:1: error: instruction not supported on this GPU (gfx1100): v_add_nc_u64 // NOGFX12: :[[@LINE-5]]:1: error: instruction not supported on this GPU (gfx1200): v_add_nc_u64 -// NOGFX9: :[[@LINE-6]]:1: error: instruction not supported on this GPU (gfx900): v_add_nc_u64 -// NOSI: :[[@LINE-7]]:1: error: instruction not supported on this GPU (tahiti): v_add_nc_u64 -// NOVI: :[[@LINE-8]]:1: error: instruction not supported on this GPU (tonga): v_add_nc_u64 +// NOGFX1250: :[[@LINE-6]]:1: error: invalid literal value ---------------- jayfoad wrote:
I'm confused why we have **both** GFX1250-* and NOGFX1250 checks for this instruction. Is it accepted on gfx1250 or not? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/197803 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
