arsenm wrote: > Should we show a warning saying that +/-xnack is ignored??
That is printed now, but I will be imminently removing that as well. It really shouldn't be directly spamming stderr from a constructor https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/204523 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
