On 03/21/2014 08:36 AM, Israel wrote: > Is there a good reason why I should build a 64bit package? If 64bit > wine can't handle VST (or much of anything) why even build a 64bit > package?
What do you mean by "or much of anything"? I run 64-bit and rarely use VSTs, so I didn't even notice they weren't working on my current LMMS installation. (I only assume they aren't because of what you just wrote; I don't even have any installed to try.) > Of course, I am not saying that 64bit Ubuntu users will simply not get > to use lmms... rather that 64bit users will have to use a 32bit package > with 32bit wine, etc.. This way 64bit users can have FULL VST, right?? I run 32-bit Firefox because the 64-bit one's RAM usage is close to double. LMMS hasn't presented any similar issues that I've noticed. Since I don't use VSTs and don't know what "much of anything" means or if it was just hyperbole because you personally consider VST support to be a core feature of LMMS, I see no reason to slum with 32-bit versions. But you're the maintainer (I assume). Rob ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
