Yeah that's what I thought as well. Just wanted to be sure.

2014-03-30 15:37 GMT+02:00 Vesa <[email protected]>:
> On 03/30/2014 03:36 PM, Lukas W. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for pointing this out, it still needs to be updated.
>> Before I correct this, I'm still unsure what the planned workflow is:
>> Should devs base the work on the unstable master branch or the
>> stable-1.0 branch (for bug fixes)?
>>
>
> I think we're supposed to base our work on the branch we're targeting...
> that would be most logical IMO.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> LMMS-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to