I thought all new features go to master
On 30 Mar 2014 15:43, "Lukas W." <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah that's what I thought as well. Just wanted to be sure.
>
> 2014-03-30 15:37 GMT+02:00 Vesa <[email protected]>:
> > On 03/30/2014 03:36 PM, Lukas W. wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Thanks for pointing this out, it still needs to be updated.
> >> Before I correct this, I'm still unsure what the planned workflow is:
> >> Should devs base the work on the unstable master branch or the
> >> stable-1.0 branch (for bug fixes)?
> >>
> >
> > I think we're supposed to base our work on the branch we're targeting...
> > that would be most logical IMO.
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > LMMS-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> LMMS-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to