Very valid point. BTW you only sent this to me. From what Im seeing this seems to be very mac specific or is that not a correct assumption to make?
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Raine M. Ekman <[email protected]> wrote: > > I guess that's one way to go. Why use a standard that's used by a lot of > other (soft|hard)ware[1] and an open source solution that supports maybe 5 > OSes and even web browsers[2] when you can roll your own? > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Sound_Control#Implementations > [2] https://github.com/charlieroberts/Control > > Citerar Jonathan Aquilina <[email protected]>: > > I was thinking of something from scratch built up from the ground up for >> lmms. >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Raine M. Ekman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Citerar Jonathan Aquilina <[email protected]>: >>> > Another thing I have noticed is that they have what they call a remote. >>> It >>> > connects via wifi which is a good thing imho as well as a bad one. I >>> was >>> > not able to connect it to FL on mac, but again that could be a bug with >>> the >>> > mac crossover wrapped version. The whole purpose of the remote is to >>> > comfortably work with FL from the comfort of ones tablet and to >>> control a >>> > wide variety of aspects of the software. I think this is something >>> that >>> > LMMS could greatly benefit from. >>> >>> OSC. And Control: http://charlie-roberts.com/Control/?page_id=19 (or >>> something like it). >>> >>> >>> > -- > [email protected] > 04 00 83 83 95 > > > -- Jonathan Aquilina
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
