On 05/30/2014 05:27 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Hi Vesa, > > 2014-05-30 16:11 GMT+02:00 Vesa <[email protected]>: >> Hey, since we've now apparently separated 1.1 as its own branch, should >> I file the models (sample-exact) branch to be merged in master so as to >> get it ready for 1.2? Or are we still considering including it for 1.1...? > Good question. I can't estimate the impact of your changes so I > personally vote for stabilizing and releasing 1.1 as fast as possible > (even though at least I don't have much time ATM) so it doesn't get > delayed unneccessary. If you're sure that the number of regressions is > going to be minimal and can be handled easily, I can fully understand > that you want to see your improvements in the upcoming release and we > should make an exception then. Thanks to your ambitious work in the > past weeks and months, I don't see a problem here.
Well, I'm not really sure myself which is the better option. I think the current changes in the models branch won't bring much if any instability, they seem to be fairly solid, as far as I can tell. But then, they don't really affect much at this point: only the native Amplifier plugin takes advantage of the sample-exact models feature currently... However there's also some changes to peak controller & LFO controller, and those changes as they are now might break some backwards compat slightly... so it might be better to move it to 1.2 just to be on the safe side... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes. www.restlet.com/download http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
