No, the package is pretty much abandonware. That's why LO took over maintenance and their version is the one in the distros. I (re)wrote https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CppUnit accordingly.
On 18 August 2014 11:52, Jonathan Aquilina <[email protected]> wrote: > Arent the fixes upstreamed? > > On 18 Aug 2014 12:43, "David Gerard" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The LO version gets bugfixes. >> >> On 18 August 2014 11:17, Jonathan Aquilina <[email protected]> wrote: >> > What is the difference in terms of using the original source vs the LO >> > version? >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:00 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> Use the Freedesktop/LibreOffice version, it's actively maintained (LO >> >> use it extensively) and thus in the distros. >> >> >> >> On 18 August 2014 09:58, Jonathan Aquilina <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hey guys I would loke to begin working on integration of unit tests >> >> > and >> >> > cppunit would be a good way to go for this. What do you guys think? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > LMMS-devel mailing list >> >> > [email protected] >> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Jonathan Aquilina ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
