I will look at getting my hands on it from the LO project. If anyone has no objections I will start looking at integrating it.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:27 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > No, the package is pretty much abandonware. That's why LO took over > maintenance and their version is the one in the distros. I (re)wrote > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CppUnit accordingly. > > On 18 August 2014 11:52, Jonathan Aquilina <[email protected]> wrote: > > Arent the fixes upstreamed? > > > > On 18 Aug 2014 12:43, "David Gerard" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> The LO version gets bugfixes. > >> > >> On 18 August 2014 11:17, Jonathan Aquilina <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > What is the difference in terms of using the original source vs the LO > >> > version? > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:00 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> +1 > >> >> > >> >> Use the Freedesktop/LibreOffice version, it's actively maintained (LO > >> >> use it extensively) and thus in the distros. > >> >> > >> >> On 18 August 2014 09:58, Jonathan Aquilina <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Hey guys I would loke to begin working on integration of unit tests > >> >> > and > >> >> > cppunit would be a good way to go for this. What do you guys think? > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >> > > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > LMMS-devel mailing list > >> >> > [email protected] > >> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Jonathan Aquilina > -- Jonathan Aquilina
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
