Hi,
2014-09-03 6:59 GMT+02:00 Vesa <[email protected]>:
> One thing that could be done is to go to MemoryManager.h, edit all the
> macros (MM_OPERATORS, MM_ALLOC, MM_FREE) to use regular dynamic
> allocations, do a custom build of it, then do a benchmark against
> vanilla memmgr branch - and add in master for comparison/baseline. This
> way we could figure out if the MemoryManager really is the culprit here,
> or if there's something else in the branch causing this performance hit.
Looks like it's not the MemoryManager - attached is a profile plot
with memmgr-rev where I reverted MM_ALLOC & co to use regular
allocators. You seem to have more commits affecting LADSPA
sample-exact processing, audio port rehaul etc.
Toby
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
