Again, this points out that we need to start merging patches.  Otherwise
we're going to be spending all our time reworking and rebasing them rather
than moving onto the next patch.  There's just no clean way to avoid this
with API changes since they tend to get very interdependent as applications
and tests start using them.

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org>
wrote:

> On 11/25/2014 12:34 AM, Mike Holmes wrote:
>
>> This no longer applies, can you rebase it ?
>>
>
> git am -3
>
> helps?
>
>
>
>
>  On 21 November 2014 08:30, Bala Manoharan <bala.manoha...@linaro.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>
>>> As discussed, as per the current API a pktio can exist without
>>> initializing
>>> the classifier and in that case the packets are sent to the default queue
>>> for that pktio. We can test the classifier using the classifier example
>>> which I am currently working in parallel.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Bala
>>>
>>> On 21 November 2014 18:18, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/21/2014 03:32 PM, Bala Manoharan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we have those as separate patches.
>>>>> I would like to keep this patch as specific for linking pktio with
>>>>> classification.
>>>>> I have created this patch from the current odp tip.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Bala
>>>>>
>>>>>  My ideas was if we link now then we have workable example/packet with
>>>> classifier.
>>>> And we can check that basic functionality works and you don't forget
>>>> init
>>>> lock or something
>>>> like that.
>>>>
>>>> Maxim.
>>>>
>>>>  On 21 November 2014 17:37, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org
>>>>> <mailto:maxim.uva...@linaro.org>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>      On 11/21/2014 11:53 AM, Balasubramanian Manoharan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>          @@ -163,7 +169,7 @@ odp_pktio_t odp_pktio_open(const char
>>>>>          *dev, odp_buffer_pool_t pool)
>>>>>
>>>>>      Bala, I sent you patch to change API to odp_pktio_open( *dev,
>>>>>      cost_t). It should be also included to that patch set.
>>>>>
>>>>>      Thanks,
>>>>>      Maxim.
>>>>>
>>>>>      _______________________________________________
>>>>>      lng-odp mailing list
>>>>>      lng-odp@lists.linaro.org <mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org>
>>>>>      http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lng-odp mailing list
>>> lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
>>> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lng-odp mailing list
> lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
>
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to