On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 06:20:02PM +0000, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> I'll take a look at odp_shared_memory.  Maxim/Stuart should take a look at 
> odp_packet_io.c.  I assume Ola's new timer code is compliant.  If not, it 
> should be.
> 
> Bill

I just sent a patch that clears the caddr_t failure.

Note that I also get build failures on one of my dev branches which has
the buffer pool patch applied, due to the use of typeof.

--
Stuart.

> 
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Mike Holmes 
> <mike.hol...@linaro.org<mailto:mike.hol...@linaro.org>> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9 December 2014 at 12:57, Bill Fischofer 
> <bill.fischo...@linaro.org<mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org>> wrote:
> If we can get a complete list of which files currently have issues I'm 
> thinking that would be an excellent list to mull over during the Christmas 
> break.
> 
> For a list just add the cflags line "./configure CFLAGS=-std=c99" and then 
> make -k 2>&1 | grep  "^.*\.c:"
> 
> Api is currently
> 
> odp_packet_io.c
> odp_shared_memory.c
> odp_timer.c
> 
> There are more in the examples
> 
>   For those of us who will be "off" we may still want a coding fix for an 
> hour or so.  :)
> 
> Also it's an excellent way for those on the ODP mailing list who want to "get 
> their hands dirty" with ODP code to tackle something small and focused.
> 
> Bill
> 
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Mike Holmes 
> <mike.hol...@linaro.org<mailto:mike.hol...@linaro.org>> wrote:
> I think adding it explicitly  when using the patch checking tool 
> "apply-and-build.sh" might be a way forward.
> 
> If we can get agreement on C99, then bugzilla already has many of these bugs 
> listed,<https://bugs.linaro.org/buglist.cgi?component=General&list_id=3080&product=OpenDataPlane&resolution=--->
>  including the source of Robbies issue. All we need is agreement that C99 is 
> our direction and git blame will show us the likely best person to fix each 
> issue.
> 
> On 9 December 2014 at 12:48, Bill Fischofer 
> <bill.fischo...@linaro.org<mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org>> wrote:
> OK, I understand this is perhaps a longer-term project, but is there a 
> file-level way we can enable this check?  If yes, then we can ask that as 
> part of modules that are currently being patched that c99 checks be included 
> in them.  That way files will be brought into compliance and then stay in 
> compliance after they've been merged.
> 
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Mike Holmes 
> <mike.hol...@linaro.org<mailto:mike.hol...@linaro.org>> wrote:
> sorry, I cleaned the history try this:
> https://ci.linaro.org/view/odp-ci/job/odp-api-check-native-c99/buildhw=x86_64,label=build/16/console
> 
> On 9 December 2014 at 12:39, Mike Holmes 
> <mike.hol...@linaro.org<mailto:mike.hol...@linaro.org>> wrote:
> Make -k gives the attached so it is easy to look past the first issue.
> We cant make it default because everything breaks, we should fix things and 
> then the CI job which
> has been building it this way for a while will eventually pass.  If we can 
> get consensus on linux-generic sticking to to C99 it is worth following up on 
> this build.
> 
> The builds are for both ARM and X86, I had not been following it becasue we 
> did not have consensus on the C99 issue: X86 is working but Arm filesystem 
> needs curl installing.
> 
> https://ci.linaro.org/view/odp-ci/job/odp-api-check-native-c99/buildhw=x86_64,label=build/14/console
> 
> We dont want to hijack the need to have ./configure check for the version we 
> are using however.
> 
> 
> On 9 December 2014 at 12:17, Bill Fischofer 
> <bill.fischo...@linaro.org<mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org>> wrote:
> I suggest we turn on that by default.  It's the one way to ensure that the 
> issues will get fixed.  Is this a stop-on-first-error situation or can we 
> have it carry on so we get a complete list of what the c99 issues are?
> 
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Mike Holmes 
> <mike.hol...@linaro.org<mailto:mike.hol...@linaro.org>> wrote:
> This might also be the right time to adhere to the use of only C99 in 
> linux-generics implementation ?
> 
> CFLAGS=-std=c99 ./configure
> make
> 
> Throws up other issues, the first is in packet_io
> 
> mike@fedora1:~/git/odp$ make
> Making all in platform
> make[1]: Entering directory '/home/mike/git/odp/platform'
> Making all in linux-generic
> make[2]: Entering directory '/home/mike/git/odp/platform/linux-generic'
>   CC       odp_packet_io.lo
> odp_packet_io.c: In function 'odp_pktio_set_mtu':
> odp_packet_io.c:512:35: error: 'caddr_t' undeclared (first use in this 
> function)
>   ret = ioctl(sockfd, SIOCSIFMTU, (caddr_t)&ifr);
>                                    ^
> odp_packet_io.c:512:35: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only 
> once for each function it appears in
> Makefile:560: recipe for target 'odp_packet_io.lo' failed
> 
> 
> 
> Mike
> 
> On 9 December 2014 at 11:48, Robbie King (robking) 
> <robk...@cisco.com<mailto:robk...@cisco.com>> wrote:
> After cloning tip just now, I found that I couldn’t build the fresh
> workspace due to having GCC 4.6.3 (the C11 changes to the atomics
> bumps minimum GCC up to 4.8 as best I can tell).  I’m not very familiar
> with what “./configure” can and can’t do, but it seems we should verify
> the compiler supports these constructs and fail during the configure
> phase (as opposed to build time).
> 
> Thanks,
> Robbie
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lng-odp mailing list
> lng-odp@lists.linaro.org<mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org>
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Mike Holmes
> Linaro  Sr Technical Manager
> LNG - ODP
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lng-odp mailing list
> lng-odp@lists.linaro.org<mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org>
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Mike Holmes
> Linaro  Sr Technical Manager
> LNG - ODP
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Mike Holmes
> Linaro  Sr Technical Manager
> LNG - ODP
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Mike Holmes
> Linaro  Sr Technical Manager
> LNG - ODP
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Mike Holmes
> Linaro  Sr Technical Manager
> LNG - ODP
> 

> _______________________________________________
> lng-odp mailing list
> lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp



_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to