Agreed. Again, this was just a rebase of Barry's earlier patch that
predated that routine. I can post a follow-on patch to address this.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org>
wrote:
> On 02/18/16 05:03, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
>> +static void busy_wait(uint64_t nanoseconds)
>> +{
>> + odp_time_t start_time, end_time;
>> + uint32_t cnt;
>> +
>> + start_time = odp_time_local();
>> + end_time = odp_time_sum(start_time,
>> + odp_time_local_from_ns(nanoseconds));
>> +
>> + while (odp_time_cmp(odp_time_local(), end_time) < 0)
>> + for (cnt = 1; cnt <= 10; cnt++)
>> + busy_wait_counter++;
>> +}
>>
> incrementing cnt looks like hack. I think odp_cpu_pause() can be used here.
>
> Maxim.
> _______________________________________________
> lng-odp mailing list
> lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
>
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
