> -----Original Message----- > From: EXT Anders Roxell [mailto:anders.rox...@linaro.org] > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 2:24 PM > To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <petri.savolai...@nokia.com> > Cc: EXT Mike Holmes <mike.hol...@linaro.org>; Maxim Uvarov > <maxim.uva...@linaro.org>; lng-odp <lng-odp@lists.linaro.org> > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv4] api: make only the API visible > > On 15 April 2016 at 13:02, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) > <petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote: > > Agree, that it gets ugly (for interface specification readability), if > GCC > > pragmas are added into spec header files. Wouldn’t it work the same way > if > > the pragmas are defined where the spec file is included. Namely e.g. > here > > for the barrier: > > I guess it would work, haven't tried. That means that all the > implementations > have to add this into their files. > If we what we have in this patch implementations gets it for "free". > > Cheers, > Anders >
Since all implementations may not support binary compatible libs or even GCC. I think it belong to implementation and those may solve it in different ways. So, I don't think that "get for free" is as important here as a clean set API spec files. -Petri _______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list lng-odp@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
