Yes, we can have a more general name, but I tend towards using something
along the lines of --enable-abi-breakage
On 25/04/16 12:59, Bill Fischofer wrote:
--enable-inlines seems reasonable but is perhaps only one component in
what's needed to enable abi mode operation. So do we need/want an
umbrella --enable-abi option that turns on all sub-options (whatever
they may be) to achieve ABI mode?
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.k...@linaro.org
<mailto:zoltan.k...@linaro.org>> wrote:
Originally I planned to have something like "-DINLINES=0/1", but
that would force the application to define this macro in any case.
Creating a config.h would be a way to overcome this maybe.
On 22/04/16 19:11, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
##########################################################################
+# Enable/disable static inlines
+##########################################################################
+AC_ARG_ENABLE([inlines],
+ [ --enable-inlines allow inlines],
+ [if test "x$enableval" = "xyes"; then
+ ODP_CFLAGS="$ODP_CFLAGS -DINLINES"
+ fi])
+
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
