On 25 April 2016 at 09:50, Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.k...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Yes, we can have a more general name, but I tend towards using something > along the lines of --enable-abi-breakage I dont like that, enable a negative? It needs to describe the intent and not a side effect. Assuming the default is performance - basically today's case, then we need to just enable abi-compliance or visa versa is enable-performance optimisations > > > On 25/04/16 12:59, Bill Fischofer wrote: > >> --enable-inlines seems reasonable but is perhaps only one component in >> what's needed to enable abi mode operation. So do we need/want an >> umbrella --enable-abi option that turns on all sub-options (whatever >> they may be) to achieve ABI mode? >> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.k...@linaro.org >> <mailto:zoltan.k...@linaro.org>> wrote: >> >> Originally I planned to have something like "-DINLINES=0/1", but >> that would force the application to define this macro in any case. >> Creating a config.h would be a way to overcome this maybe. >> >> >> >> >> On 22/04/16 19:11, Zoltan Kiss wrote: >> >> >> >> ########################################################################## >> +# Enable/disable static inlines >> >> +########################################################################## >> +AC_ARG_ENABLE([inlines], >> + [ --enable-inlines allow inlines], >> + [if test "x$enableval" = "xyes"; then >> + ODP_CFLAGS="$ODP_CFLAGS -DINLINES" >> + fi]) >> + >> >> >> -- Mike Holmes Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> *│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs "Work should be fun and collaborative, the rest follows"
_______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list lng-odp@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
