Balasubramanian Manoharan(bala-manoharan) replied on github web page:

include/odp/api/spec/packet_flags.h
line 4
@@ -249,6 +249,14 @@ int odp_packet_has_ipsec(odp_packet_t pkt);
  */
 int odp_packet_has_udp(odp_packet_t pkt);
 
+/** Check for VxLAN


Comment:
Okay

> Balasubramanian Manoharan(bala-manoharan) wrote:
> Will change the typo.


>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>> The "TODO" can't stand by itself. Sounds like we need an additional 
>> `odp_classification_capability()` bit to indicate whether inner packets are 
>> included in the parse?


>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>> Typo: modified


>>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>>> Need to validate that the packet (and specified UDP length) is large 
>>>> enough to contain the VXLAN header and the encapsulated packet.


>>>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>>>> Inclusion of new APIs means this PR must be against api-next, not master.


>>>>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>>>>> [RFC 7348](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7348) uses VXLAN, not VxLAN. I 
>>>>>> think we should use that throughout ODP as well as it avoids unnecessary 
>>>>>> CamelCase.


>>>>>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>>>>>> Same comments here as for helper version of file.


>>>>>>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>>>>>>> Typo: reserve, not reseve? Perhaps better for these to be anonymous 
>>>>>>>> bitfields if they are truly unreferenced?


https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/345#discussion_r157151460
updated_at 2017-12-15 09:08:10

Reply via email to