On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Elizabeth Krumbach <l...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> Does anyone disagree with coming to the conclusion that we need to >> make sure a LoCo focuses on a whole state and not just one city in a >> state? -- I thought that was in the definition of a LoCo, but I could >> just be a liberal judge ;) > > I agree that LoCos should work to encourage and promote events > throughout their country. This means sharing team resources, making > sure everyone is notified of upcoming events and projects, and in > general encouraging individuals in their areas to do LoCo stuff where > they live (an installfest may be tricky, but it only takes one person > to put some Ubuntu CDs in their local library!). > > However, I wouldn't berate teams who are generally much more active in > cities. There are more people in cities, more people can take on more > ambitious projects, and these anchor city teams will always exist. > Folks in cities cannot MAKE people in less populated areas do events > and be active, the people who live there have to do that, all the city > folks can do is to encourage them and be supportive when they do.
Which is why I don't think it should be a hard standard, and why I use words like "encourage" and "foster". No one is saying "you'll be unapproved if you don't". I think we're all taking this a bit harder then it was intended > > -- > Elizabeth Krumbach // Lyz // pleia2 > http://www.princessleia.com > > -- > loco-contacts mailing list > loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts > -- #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- loco-contacts mailing list loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
