> It doesn't look like there's other members still around.... I'm still lurking but have not touched the code for awhile.
It is, and has been, unclear what needs to happen for a 0.11.0 release candidate [1]. Much of the problem is that there's no concensus on what build system should work. Autotools, Maven, and some collection of Windows IDE projects all exist in various states. Many user questions involve the latter, which Thorsten fields impressively well. The remainder of the release - readiness concerns voiced since incubation involve Windows thread safely to which I cannot speak. Again, Thorsten fields these and has nudged the code forward as he has been able. I believe we can get a release out if we can decide on what it must contain, and how it must build. Following APR on a build process would be ideal but I have not been able to glean which build system(s?) of theirs they consider blessed. - Rhys [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/logging-log4cxx-dev/201410.mbox/ <CAKDqugR-iVw2j1SuufSrPiiPAVbBWdsVXyN%2BuT%3D7x8461-ewkA%40mail.gmail.com>
