On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com>
wrote:

>
> A report that states "no change since last month" is not a great
> report, but it is better than copying-and-pasting.  But in fact there
> are interesting things to say about log4cxx's development the last
> month: it would help the IMPC to better understand the podling's state
> to know that while there remains a willing volunteer, there was no
> visible progress made towards a release. Also, the state of Bill Rowe
> as Mentor is worth reporting on, even if to say it is unresolved.
>

 Indeed, and it begs a reply.

1. We have an offer to prepare a release candidate, that's positive.

2. We have several working on the grand question of build schemas
   (which is not a must-fix for the very next release, but will be good
   to finally resolve and then release in the coming months).

3. We did not have an answer to whether 3+ project members are
   willing to review and vote for a candidate when I last raised the Q.

If there are three+ active project members volunteering to review and
cast up/down votes on release candidates, then I am committed
to mentoring this community and see it graduate.  If there is still
not a sufficient community at present, this might be better at
labs.apache.org, or folded into another TLP who will assume the
responsibility of reviewing and casting release votes.

Reply via email to