On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote:
> > A report that states "no change since last month" is not a great > report, but it is better than copying-and-pasting. But in fact there > are interesting things to say about log4cxx's development the last > month: it would help the IMPC to better understand the podling's state > to know that while there remains a willing volunteer, there was no > visible progress made towards a release. Also, the state of Bill Rowe > as Mentor is worth reporting on, even if to say it is unresolved. > Indeed, and it begs a reply. 1. We have an offer to prepare a release candidate, that's positive. 2. We have several working on the grand question of build schemas (which is not a must-fix for the very next release, but will be good to finally resolve and then release in the coming months). 3. We did not have an answer to whether 3+ project members are willing to review and vote for a candidate when I last raised the Q. If there are three+ active project members volunteering to review and cast up/down votes on release candidates, then I am committed to mentoring this community and see it graduate. If there is still not a sufficient community at present, this might be better at labs.apache.org, or folded into another TLP who will assume the responsibility of reviewing and casting release votes.