I should follow this up. My understanding is that the goal of this project in the incubator is to have at least 3 active committers who can demonstrate their ability to perform releases. Once that is accomplished those committers should be able to become Logging PMC members and the project can move back.
I don’t really see anything in the report that gives an indication of how close or far away we are and looking at the dev mailing list I am not sure either. Ralph > On Mar 1, 2016, at 5:46 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > On Mar 1, 2016 6:36 PM, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com > <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote: > > > > > >> On Mar 1, 2016, at 1:13 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net > >> <mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net>> wrote: > >> > >> The fact that the logging PMC had no interest in including its > >> contributors was a shame, let's work to avoid such mistakes in the future, > >> and build an effective ppmc. > > > > > > I don’t understand this statement. What contributors are you speaking of? > > There were no PMC members working on log4cxx at the time and no active > > committers as I recall. The PMC would have been willing to make the > > interested parties committers but no one on the PMC had any familiarity > > with the code base and so weren’t prepared to vote on a release. > > I may have misunderstood, thanks for clarifying. > > Bill
