Hi, What about socket appenders? wont it be better than file appender, in your case. You can receive the data from other side. I think it'll be faster.
regards, *Chand Priyankara* [image: Facebook]<http://www.facebook.com/chand.priyankara> [image: LinkedIn] <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/chandpriyankara> [image: Blogger] <http://chandpriyankara.blogspot.com/> [image: Google Plus]<http://plus.google.com/104246340732624023499> |BSc(Eng) - Electrical & Information |(094) 773-361-566 |ch...@engineering.com |http://chandpriyankara.blogspot.com <http://www.iucnredlist.org/amazing-species>sent via internet On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Rhys Ulerich <rhys.uler...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Curiosity, turning off the buffering on FileAppender isn't close enough > to what you want? > > > > Well, maybe. > > But won't turning off buffering severely decrease performance because of > higher i/o activity? > > Yeah. I was thinking that one would toss the file onto something > RAMish. But you're right that it won't have the performance profile > you want. > > Sorry, > Rhys >
