Hi, Yup, makes sense. I looked at the example actions and the ones in log4j/joran/action. I kept thinking how nice it'd be if Digester didn't have any dependencies ;)
Yoav --- Ceki G�lc� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 09:03 PM 12/7/2004, Yoav Shapira wrote: > > >Why must Joran actions have a logger per instance, out of curiosity? > > Well, it is preferable to have the logs go the repository being > currently configured. If log4j.jar is in common/lib, an Action's > static Logger will be loaded once. Consequently, that static logger is > very likely be attached to the default logger repository instead of > the repository currently being acted upon (by the Action). > > Make sense? > > I assume you looked at the actions in /examples/joran, correct? > > >Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com > > -- > Ceki G�lc� > > The complete log4j manual: http://qos.ch/log4j/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
