Hi, --- Ceki G�lc� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You mean because of the duplication or because you prefer Digester?
Because of the duplication. Joran is nice because it's lightweight and simple, but Digester is more mature and better tested. I'm never a big fan of duplication, but I realize in this case Digester's dependencies might be a showstopper. So I don't think log4j is at fault at all here. If I had more spare time I'd try to lobby Senor Donkin (who's been taking care of Digester virtually by himself for a while now) to just copy that one ArrayStack class from commons-colletions into Digester itself. (I know that's duplication as well, but it's just one class, and the benefits would outweigh the cos here I think). Then if we could creatively massage the Digester dependency on commons-logging such that log4j can be used, voila ;) It's not trivial, no one's at fault, but it could be nice ;) Yoav --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
