https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42171
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 21:45:36 PST --- Guess our messages crossed. But yeah, having now worked in the code a little, I agree that it's a little shetchy. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with the design, just that there was no way to signify a "normal" socket close (it always shows up as an Exception). It'd probably be worth the time to think through what should happen in that case, because the patch I added basically just treats all exceptions as expected when you try to close the socket. Probably also worth double checking the locking. I didn't look at it in detail, but a couple parts look odd at first glance. Anyway, if that patch pans out, feel free to have the beer delivered to my fridge :) Never hurts to have a few extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
