On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I need to use some of the classes that were copied to core from receivers in
> 1165491 (rewriteappender, utillogginglevel)...
>
> Will there be a log4j release soon or should I duplicate these classes in
> Chainsaw?  I don't want a log4j release to hold up a Chainsaw release.

I doubt there will be a new log4j release in near future. Therefore I
am +1 on making Chainsaw independent. To my knowledge it is only 3
classes or so, I would go with duplicating them.

But I think I would change the package to prevent a conflict with a
later log4j which might have the same classes



>
> Scott
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Definitely!
>>
>> Anything to simplify things and get this out the door!
>>
>> Thanks for all your help Christian,
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > ok, moving ahead with removal then
>>>
>>> Thanks, and have fun - removing old stuff makes me always feel good,
>>> hope it is the same feeling for you :-)
>>>
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>>> > <grobme...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > ok, I'll nuke component and receivers and pull the useful bits in to
>>> >> > chainsaw...does that mean we should remove the parent maven project
>>> >> > then?
>>> >>
>>> >> If you speak of the parent for Companions: yes.
>>> >> I think we can remove the whole Companions tree to the attic then
>>> >>
>>> >> Christian
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Scott
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Curt Arnold <carn...@apache.org>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Forget the packaging renaming bit. No need to make Chainsaw an OSGi
>>> >> >> package and no need to add additional work.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>> >>
>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>>>
>>
>
>



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to