I would need to make a new release of Chainsaw after the log4j release at
some point, assuming I needed other things from the updated version of
log4j, but right now Chainsaw depends on 1.2.16 and bundles it in the
standalone and DMG builds...so I think I'm ok.. (?)

Scott

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Scott Deboy <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I'm leaning toward keeping them in the same package location - when log4j
> is
> > released, I can remove the classes from Chainsaw and everything will
> still
> > work.
>
> But you need to make a new release of chainsaw together with the new
> release of log4j, right?
>
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Christian Grobmeier <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Scott Deboy <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > I need to use some of the classes that were copied to core from
> >> > receivers in
> >> > 1165491 (rewriteappender, utillogginglevel)...
> >> >
> >> > Will there be a log4j release soon or should I duplicate these classes
> >> > in
> >> > Chainsaw?  I don't want a log4j release to hold up a Chainsaw release.
> >>
> >> I doubt there will be a new log4j release in near future. Therefore I
> >> am +1 on making Chainsaw independent. To my knowledge it is only 3
> >> classes or so, I would go with duplicating them.
> >>
> >> But I think I would change the package to prevent a conflict with a
> >> later log4j which might have the same classes
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Scott
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Scott Deboy <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Definitely!
> >> >>
> >> >> Anything to simplify things and get this out the door!
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks for all your help Christian,
> >> >>
> >> >> Scott
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> >> >> <[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Scott Deboy <[email protected]
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> > ok, moving ahead with removal then
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks, and have fun - removing old stuff makes me always feel good,
> >> >>> hope it is the same feeling for you :-)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> >> >>> > <[email protected]>
> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Scott Deboy
> >> >>> >> <[email protected]>
> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> > ok, I'll nuke component and receivers and pull the useful bits
> in
> >> >>> >> > to
> >> >>> >> > chainsaw...does that mean we should remove the parent maven
> >> >>> >> > project
> >> >>> >> > then?
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> If you speak of the parent for Companions: yes.
> >> >>> >> I think we can remove the whole Companions tree to the attic then
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Christian
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > Scott
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Curt Arnold <
> [email protected]>
> >> >>> >> > wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> Forget the packaging renaming bit. No need to make Chainsaw an
> >> >>> >> >> OSGi
> >> >>> >> >> package and no need to add additional work.
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> >> >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> >>> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> --
> >> >>> >> http://www.grobmeier.de
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> http://www.grobmeier.de
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://www.grobmeier.de
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to