hey ralph,
its a pleasure. I like that code and it is impressive that you wrote i
mostly alone
I have found an error on this page. There is a sample like that:
"loggers": {
"logger": { "name": "EventLogger", "level": "info",
"additivity": "false", "appender-ref": { "ref": "Routing" }},
"root": { "level": "error", "appender-ref": { "ref": "STDOUT" }}
}
On the same page, above the example you mentioned below.
When i have time, I will try this further and correct it
Probably tomorrow or this night.
Cheers
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> Wow - it is really great to have you digging into this.
>
> Did you look
> at http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/log4j2/manual/configuration.html? It has
> two sample json configuration files and talks about what you need to do to
> use arrays. In particular, the loggers section looks like
>
> "loggers": {
> "logger": [
> { "name": "EventLogger", "level": "info", "additivity": "false",
> "appender-ref": { "ref": "Routing" }},
> { "name": "com.foo.bar", "level": "error", "additivity": "false",
> "appender-ref": { "ref": "Console" }}
> ],
> "root": { "level": "error", "appender-ref": { "ref": "STDOUT" }}
> }
>
> Ralph
>
>
> On Apr 28, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
> Hei folks,
>
> i created a simple json configuration. I could not load it for unknown
> reasons, but I want to address something else with this message.
>
> Given this:
>
> {
> "configuration": {
> "appenders": {
> "Console": {
> "name": "Console",
> "PatternLayout": {
> "pattern": "%m%n"
> }
> }
> },
> "loggers": {
> "logger": {
> "name": "Sub",
> "level": "TRACE",
> "appender-ref": {
> "ref": "Console"
> }
> },
> "root": {
> "level": "error",
> "appender-ref": {
> "ref": "Console"
> }
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
> Why don't we use JSON arrays? For example in the "loggers" Objekt we
> define a "logger" and "root". It seems to me that I would need another
> "logger" pretty soon. It is more or less a type of what I want. But
> having the same keys in one single object feels strange. It is not
> permitted form the json format (to my knowledge), but what I somebody
> wants to create a gui to create these files? In case of for example JS
> he might have a problem with duplicated keys.
>
> We could rewrite it to:
>
> "loggers": [
> {
> "type" : "logger",
> "name": "Sub",
> "level": "TRACE",
> "appender-ref": { "ref": "Console" }
> },
> {
> "type" : "root",
> "name": "App",
> "level": "TRACE",
> "appender-ref": { "ref": "Console" }
> }
> ],
>
>
> This feels more intuitive to me and might avoid problems when others
> want ot use that file. At the moment I am not educated on the impacts
> of this change yet. I would say the same should happen with appenders
> or any other key, which holds a list of objects.
>
> Cheers
> Christian
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>
>
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
