No objections here, either. I really hate that we'll have all of these directories redundantly prefixed with log4j-, but if it makes our life easier with Maven, I can't argue.
N On Aug 23, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > From my perspective there is no controversy. It is just a matter of timing. > I am OK if you want to apply the patch now. > > Ralph > > On Aug 23, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> WRT LOG4J2-333 Match artifact ids with Maven module names >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-333) >> >> Is there any controversy here? >> >> I'm sure none of use want to deal with Maven more than we have to. After >> this change, all of the module directories will have the same names as the >> artifact IDs, all nicely prefixed with "log4j-". >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Gary >> >> -- >> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >> Spring Batch in Action >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >