No objections here, either. I really hate that we'll have all of these 
directories redundantly prefixed with log4j-, but if it makes our life easier 
with Maven, I can't argue.

N

On Aug 23, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:

> From my perspective there is no controversy.  It is just a matter of timing.  
> I am OK if you want to apply the patch now.
> 
> Ralph
> 
> On Aug 23, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> 
>> WRT LOG4J2-333 Match artifact ids with Maven module names 
>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-333)
>> 
>> Is there any controversy here?
>> 
>> I'm sure none of use want to deal with Maven more than we have to. After 
>> this change, all of the module directories will have the same names as the 
>> artifact IDs, all nicely prefixed with "log4j-".
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> Gary
>> 
>> -- 
>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org 
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>> Spring Batch in Action
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> 

Reply via email to