No problem. On Saturday, August 24, 2013, Nick Williams wrote:
> No objections here, either. I really hate that we'll have all of these > directories redundantly prefixed with log4j-, but if it makes our life > easier with Maven, I can't argue. > > N > > On Aug 23, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > From my perspective there is no controversy. It is just a matter of > timing. I am OK if you want to apply the patch now. > > Ralph > > On Aug 23, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > WRT LOG4J2-333 Match artifact ids with Maven module names ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-333) > > Is there any controversy here? > > I'm sure none of use want to deal with Maven more than we have to. After > this change, all of the module directories will have the same names as the > artifact IDs, all nicely prefixed with "log4j-". > > Thoughts? > > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'garydgreg...@gmail.com');> | ggreg...@apache.org <javascript:_e({}, > 'cvml', 'ggreg...@apache.org');> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second > Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > >
