On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Ralph Goers <rgo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Well, I was going to ask what needs to be done to get to a GA release - > I'd prefer there not be a beta10 if it isn't required. I do think the OSGi > stuff needs to be addressed for that but I am not sure what else. From a > timing perspective I think this is about the time we were shooting for to > release so I am OK with that. > I know it takes cycles to spin a beta (and I've not been doing them, thank you Ralph! ;) but I look at it the other way around. Why not spin another beta? It seems like a good time, we have *loads* of bug fixes in and some new features IRRC, and at least one large hump to go over OSGi. Just sayin... ;) Gary > > Ralph > > On Aug 27, 2013, at 6:17 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All > > I wonder if we should release the next beta9 now and then all focus on > OSGi the best we can. > > This would let us push out a lot of fixes and make beta10 all about OSGi. > > Thoughts? > > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second > Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
