I'm not saying we shouldn't release beta9. I'm suggesting that we target the following release as GA, provided we fix everything we believe is required for a GA release.
Ralph On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:00 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Ralph Goers <rgo...@apache.org> wrote: >> Well, I was going to ask what needs to be done to get to a GA release - I'd >> prefer there not be a beta10 if it isn't required. I do think the OSGi >> stuff needs to be addressed for that but I am not sure what else. From a >> timing perspective I think this is about the time we were shooting for to >> release so I am OK with that. > > I know it takes cycles to spin a beta (and I've not been doing them, thank > you Ralph! ;) but I look at it the other way around. Why not spin another > beta? It seems like a good time, we have *loads* of bug fixes in and some new > features IRRC, and at least one large hump to go over OSGi. Just sayin... ;) > > Gary > >> >> Ralph >> >> On Aug 27, 2013, at 6:17 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All >>> >>> I wonder if we should release the next beta9 now and then all focus on OSGi >>> the best we can. >>> >>> This would let us push out a lot of fixes and make beta10 all about OSGi. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>> Spring Batch in Action >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
