I haven't really heard anything to make me change my mind. 2.0. Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 11:44 PM, Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> > wrote: > > Maybe he'll respond again tonight and let us know if he's set on 2.0 or fine > with 2.0.0. :-) > > N > >> On Feb 4, 2014, at 1:42 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> I'm happy to let Ralph pick, either way is fine with me. >> >> Gary >> >> >>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Nick Williams >>> <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: >>> Matt and Christian did, however, point out semver. There's something to be >>> said about following a community practice, and use of x.y.z far outweighs >>> use of x.y in OSS. >>> >>> N >>> >>>> On Feb 4, 2014, at 1:21 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>> >>>> Nick, >>>> >>>> I do not think you can go wrong by writing 2.0 in the book. I'm OK with >>>> 2.0 and 2.0.0 even though 2.0.0 feels redundant. Like someone else posted >>>> I find the .FINAL and -RELEASE and whatnot ludicrous. >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Nick Williams >>>>> <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: >>>>> Well well well. I'm sensing a lot of disagreement. Too bad my book goes >>>>> to the printers Wednesday. I have a feeling no matter what I put in it >>>>> there's a good chance it'll change. :-P >>>>> >>>>> Any way we can come to a consensus in the next 6-8 hours or so (by 9 a.m. >>>>> CST)? >>>>> >>>>> N >>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 3, 2014, at 3:46 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Plus, if we're really keen on OSGi support, note that OSGi assumes >>>>>> version numbers follow the semantic versioning scheme. Producers use an >>>>>> API like [1.1, 1.2), whereas consumers use an API like [1.1, 2.0). Yes, >>>>>> those are half-open intervals, and yes, that is the official notation. :) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3 February 2014 15:41, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On 3 Feb 2014, at 22:14, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > I like 2.0.0 because semver.org etc., although as long as it's not a >>>>>>> > dumb >>>>>>> > version number like GA or RELEASE or Final, I'm happy with it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sticking with semver might be a good idea. Its a language many >>>>>>> understand >>>>>>> and we should try to stick with that lanugage as well. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On 3 February 2014 07:07, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >> Keep it simple: 2.0. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Gary >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> -------- Original message -------- >>>>>>> >> From: Christian Grobmeier >>>>>>> >> Date:02/03/2014 05:12 (GMT-05:00) >>>>>>> >> To: Log4J Developers List >>>>>>> >> Subject: Re: What will the GA version number be? >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Also 2.0 or 2.0.0 for me >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> On 3 Feb 2014, at 7:41, Ralph Goers wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>> I had thought it would be 2.0. >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> On Feb 2, 2014, at 8:59 PM, Nick Williams >>>>>>> >>>> <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> I'm finalizing the logging chapter of my book to send to the >>>>>>> >>>> printers >>>>>>> >>>> Wednesday (I'm so glad I got to correct it to say Level was >>>>>>> >>>> extendable!), and I need to know what the Maven artifact GA version >>>>>>> >>>> number will be. I print the new Maven artifacts used in each >>>>>>> >>>> chapter >>>>>>> >>>> on the first page of the chapter as a guide to the user. Log4j is >>>>>>> >>>> the >>>>>>> >>>> only library I'm using that isn't yet GA. I want to be sure the >>>>>>> >>>> version numbers I'm printing are correct. >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> Here are the options that I can think of for the GA release: >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> 2.0 >>>>>>> >>>> 2.0-GA >>>>>>> >>>> 2.0.GA >>>>>>> >>>> 2.0.Final >>>>>>> >>>> 2.0.RELEASE >>>>>>> >>>> 2.0.0 >>>>>>> >>>> 2.0.0-GA >>>>>>> >>>> 2.0.0.GA >>>>>>> >>>> 2.0.0.Final >>>>>>> >>>> 2.0.0.RELEASE >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> So, which is it going to be? I assume that eventually we're going >>>>>>> >>>> to >>>>>>> >>>> have a 2.0.1, 2.0.2, etc., so it would seem to me that, whatever GA >>>>>>> >>>> is, it should start with 2.0.0. Doesn't seem to make a lot of sense >>>>>>> >>>> to go from 2.0 to 2.0.1. However, all of our beta releases have >>>>>>> >>>> been >>>>>>> >>>> 2.0-Betan. >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> Nick >>>>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>>>>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>>>>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> --- >>>>>>> >> http://www.grobmeier.de >>>>>>> >> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL >>>>>>> >> @grobmeier >>>>>>> >> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > -- >>>>>>> > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> http://www.grobmeier.de >>>>>>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL >>>>>>> @grobmeier >>>>>>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>>> Spring Batch in Action >>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> >> >> -- >> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >> Spring Batch in Action >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >
