I prefer the aesthetics of 2.0, but prefer 2.0.0 due to semver. Then again, as long as we make the OSGi version 2.0.0, we're good. That's configurable in the OSGi pom.xml files.
On 4 February 2014 05:02, Ralph Goers <rgo...@apache.org> wrote: > I haven't really heard anything to make me change my mind. 2.0. > > Sent from my iPad > > On Feb 3, 2014, at 11:44 PM, Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> > wrote: > > Maybe he'll respond again tonight and let us know if he's set on 2.0 or > fine with 2.0.0. :-) > > N > > On Feb 4, 2014, at 1:42 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I'm happy to let Ralph pick, either way is fine with me. > > Gary > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Nick Williams < > nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: > >> Matt and Christian did, however, point out semver. There's something to >> be said about following a community practice, and use of x.y.z far >> outweighs use of x.y in OSS. >> >> N >> >> On Feb 4, 2014, at 1:21 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> Nick, >> >> I do not think you can go wrong by writing 2.0 in the book. I'm OK with >> 2.0 and 2.0.0 even though 2.0.0 feels redundant. Like someone else posted I >> find the .FINAL and -RELEASE and whatnot ludicrous. >> >> Gary >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Nick Williams < >> nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: >> >>> Well well well. I'm sensing a lot of disagreement. Too bad my book goes >>> to the printers Wednesday. I have a feeling no matter what I put in it >>> there's a good chance it'll change. :-P >>> >>> Any way we can come to a consensus in the next 6-8 hours or so (by 9 >>> a.m. CST)? >>> >>> N >>> >>> On Feb 3, 2014, at 3:46 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: >>> >>> Plus, if we're really keen on OSGi support, note that OSGi assumes >>> version numbers follow the semantic versioning scheme. Producers use an API >>> like [1.1, 1.2), whereas consumers use an API like [1.1, 2.0). Yes, those >>> are half-open intervals, and yes, that is the official notation. :) >>> >>> >>> On 3 February 2014 15:41, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> On 3 Feb 2014, at 22:14, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>> >>>> > I like 2.0.0 because semver.org etc., although as long as it's not a >>>> dumb >>>> > version number like GA or RELEASE or Final, I'm happy with it. >>>> >>>> Sticking with semver might be a good idea. Its a language many >>>> understand >>>> and we should try to stick with that lanugage as well. >>>> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On 3 February 2014 07:07, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Keep it simple: 2.0. >>>> >> >>>> >> Gary >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> -------- Original message -------- >>>> >> From: Christian Grobmeier >>>> >> Date:02/03/2014 05:12 (GMT-05:00) >>>> >> To: Log4J Developers List >>>> >> Subject: Re: What will the GA version number be? >>>> >> >>>> >> Also 2.0 or 2.0.0 for me >>>> >> >>>> >> On 3 Feb 2014, at 7:41, Ralph Goers wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>> I had thought it would be 2.0. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> On Feb 2, 2014, at 8:59 PM, Nick Williams >>>> >>>> <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm finalizing the logging chapter of my book to send to the >>>> printers >>>> >>>> Wednesday (I'm so glad I got to correct it to say Level was >>>> >>>> extendable!), and I need to know what the Maven artifact GA version >>>> >>>> number will be. I print the new Maven artifacts used in each >>>> chapter >>>> >>>> on the first page of the chapter as a guide to the user. Log4j is >>>> the >>>> >>>> only library I'm using that isn't yet GA. I want to be sure the >>>> >>>> version numbers I'm printing are correct. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Here are the options that I can think of for the GA release: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2.0 >>>> >>>> 2.0-GA >>>> >>>> 2.0.GA >>>> >>>> 2.0.Final >>>> >>>> 2.0.RELEASE >>>> >>>> 2.0.0 >>>> >>>> 2.0.0-GA >>>> >>>> 2.0.0.GA >>>> >>>> 2.0.0.Final >>>> >>>> 2.0.0.RELEASE >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> So, which is it going to be? I assume that eventually we're going >>>> to >>>> >>>> have a 2.0.1, 2.0.2, etc., so it would seem to me that, whatever GA >>>> >>>> is, it should start with 2.0.0. Doesn't seem to make a lot of sense >>>> >>>> to go from 2.0 to 2.0.1. However, all of our beta releases have >>>> been >>>> >>>> 2.0-Betan. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Nick >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> --- >>>> >> http://www.grobmeier.de >>>> >> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL >>>> >> @grobmeier >>>> >> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB >>>> >> >>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> --- >>>> http://www.grobmeier.de >>>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL >>>> @grobmeier >>>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second >> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> >> > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second > Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
